Tune in Tuesday with Katelyn: But it’s you I fell into

tune-in-tuesday-90s-editionFor this week’s Tune in Tuesday, I’ve picked a song that I think captures the essence of ’90s music in all its grungy, alternative glory. Also, I am totally adoring the music video and its spoof of those hilarious Mentos commercials (“Mentos: The Freshmaker!”). And I do like the Foo Fighters…it’s nice that some of our nostalgic ’90s bands are still around, no? Here they are with “Big Me,” which was (according to Wikipedia) nominated for five VMAs in 1996. I feel very old now.

Review: The Last Enchantment

The Last EnchantmentMary Stewart, The Last Enchantment

This third book in Stewart’s Merlin saga picks up right where The Hollow Hills left off: Arthur has just been crowned High King of Britain, and now he must confront the various threats to his kingdom. He immediately engages in battle with the Saxons and attains victory after victory, but the more serious dangers to Arthur’s kingship come from within. First, Morgause has managed to hide away Mordred, the son she conceived during her incestuous liaison with Arthur, who will ultimately be Arthur’s doom. There’s also the necessity of ensuring the succession, which means Arthur must find a bride. And finally, some of the northern kings are chafing under Arthur’s rule, so he faces internal rebellions as well as external threats. Through all of this, Merlin remains by Arthur’s side to give him advice, friendship, and the occasional prophecy.

My biggest feeling on finishing this book is one of relief — I’m finally done with this trilogy! (Yes, there is a fourth book, The Wicked Day, but I don’t own that one and have no intention of reading it.) It’s not badly written at all, but it moves so slowly that I couldn’t wait to be done! I think the pitfall of telling Arthur’s story from Merlin’s point of view is that (at least in this version of events) Merlin likes to go off by himself to read or tend his garden or visit foreign lands, so he’s not by Arthur’s side during all the interesting parts. There’s almost nothing in this book about Arthur’s knights, or his relationship with Guinevere, or most of the famous legends of Camelot. In short, I found this book — and the series as a whole — pretty boring, although maybe Arthur enthusiasts would enjoy it more. Personally, it’s not something I ever need to read again.

Tune in Tuesday with Katelyn: I felt so symbolic yesterday

tune-in-tuesday-90s-editionSo I actually had a different song all picked out for this week’s Tune in Tuesday…but then this song came on the radio earlier today, and I knew I had to change my plans. It’s a song that immediately makes me smile whenever I hear it, although the lyrics are actually quite sad. It’s also a song that has aged really well, I think. Even though it came out 20 years ago (which is horrifying but true — the album August and Everything After came out in 1993!), everyone knows it, and it’s still played on the radio all the time. In short, it’s a classic! So without further ado, here’s Counting Crows with “Mr. Jones”:

What’s in a Name 6 Challenge Wrap-up

I’ve completed the What’s in a Name 6 Challenge at Beth Fish Reads!

2013 what's in a name 6

The goal was to read 6 books, one in each of the categories below. Here’s what I read:

  1. Up or down (or equivalent): Niccolò RISING by Dorothy Dunnett
  2. Something you’d find in your kitchen: The CRYSTAL Cave by Mary Stewart — I was thinking fancy crystal glassware here
  3. Party or celebration: The WEDDING of Zein by Tayeb Salih
  4. Fire (or equivalent): FIRE and Hemlock by Diana Wynne Jones
  5. Emotion: LONESOME Dove by Larry McMurtry
  6. Lost or found (or equivalent): They FOUND Him Dead by Georgette Heyer

My favorite read for this challenge was probably Fire and Hemlock, although Lonesome Dove and The Wedding of Zein were also very good. On the other hand, I couldn’t stand Niccolò Rising! But I like this challenge because it’s completely based on titles rather than content, which is pretty unique among reading challenges. Hopefully it will continue next year, in which case I’ll most likely sign up!

2013 Vintage Mysteries Challenge Wrap-up

I recently completed the annual Vintage Mystery Reading Challenge at My Reader’s Block! The general goal is to read mysteries published before 1960, and this year’s twist was to fit them within certain pre-arranged categories, à la Scattergories.

2013 vintage mystery scattergories

Here’s what I read, along with a brief explanation of why each book fits within its specified category:

  1. World Traveler: Patricia Moyes, Dead Men Don’t Ski — Set in the Italian Alps.
  2. Repeat Offenders: Georgette Heyer, Death in the Stocks — Because I love me some Heyer!
  3. Murderous Methods: Anthony Berkeley, The Poisoned Chocolates Case — Makes me think twice about eating food I get in the mail…
  4. Staging the Crime: Michael Innes, Hamlet, Revenge! — An amateur performance of Hamlet turns deadly.
  5. Country House Criminals: Georgette Heyer, Behold, Here’s Poison — I love a good English country house murder!
  6. Murder Is Academic: Isaac Asimov, A Whiff of Death — Chemistry professors and their murderous impulses.
  7. Yankee Doodle Dandy: Ellery Queen, The Roman Hat Mystery — New York, New York, it’s a hell of a town.
  8. Malicious Men: Georgette Heyer, They Found Him Dead — Only male victims in this one!

I really enjoyed my reading for this challenge! The Roman Hat Mystery was probably my least favorite read, but I still liked it — and The Poisoned Chocolates Case in particular was absolutely wonderful! Can’t wait to sign up for the 2014 Vintage Mystery Challenge…you’ll probably be seeing that post in the next day or two! 🙂

Review: They Found Him Dead

They Found Him DeadGeorgette Heyer, They Found Him Dead

This book begins, as so many classic British mysteries do, with an ill-fated party at an English country house. Silas Kane is celebrating his 60th birthday, but many of his guests aren’t in a particularly happy mood. His heir, Clement, is desperate to get his hands on a piece of the older man’s fortune — especially because his beautiful but materialistic wife, Rosemary, is threatening to leave him. Meanwhile, Silas’ neighbor and business partner is eager to interest him in an investment opportunity, but so far he has stubbornly refused to consider the deal. So when Silas is discovered dead the day after the party — having apparently fallen over the cliff where he habitually took a walk every evening — there is no shortage of suspects to consider. And when Clement is shot in the study shortly afterwards, it seems clear that a murderer is at work. Once again, Inspector Hannasyde of Scotland Yard must untangle the various motives in play and discover the identity of a ruthless killer.

I’ve been steadily working my way through Heyer’s mysteries, and this book is a typical example. I always enjoy Heyer’s witty dialogue and hints of romance, although in this book the love story is very peripheral to the main plot. The mystery itself is fine, though there’s nothing particularly surprising for those who read a lot of detective novels. As always, the strength of Heyer’s books is her characters, and there several great ones here, from the self-absorbed Rosemary Kane to the exuberant young Timothy Harte, who is overly eager to assist the police in solving the murder. I should note, however, that while Inspector Hannasyde is a recurring character in Heyer’s mysteries, he is definitely not the protagonist; each individual book tends to revolve around the victim and the suspects much more than around the detective. Anyway, I definitely liked this book overall, but there’s nothing that makes it particularly stand out to me.